Euroacademia Conferences
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition) April 24 - 25, 2020
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition) June 12 - 13, 2020
- 8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again January 24 - 25, 2020
- Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition) December 13 - 14, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition) October 25 - 26, 2019
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition) June 28 - 29, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition) January 25 - 26, 2019
- 7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again November 23 - 24, 2018
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition) September 28 - 30, 2018
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition) June 14 - 15, 2018
’Wounded Attachments’ and Memory Making in Eastern Europe
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Dana Dolghin, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract:
This presentations considers the entanglement between official memory narratives and what W. Brown identifies as ‘wounded attachments’ (Brown 1995). Since politics of recognition are reliant on manners of referring to the past, much of the remembrance practice in Europe juxtaposes an acknowledgement of a state of being injured and injurable and national imaginaries. Memory, moreover, is increasingly employed to codify participation, notions of citizenship and transnational constructs. Considering such ‘surfeit of memory’ (Ch. Maier), however, Brown warns that a memory based identity politics runs the inevitable risk of foreclosing the emancipatory premises of politicized identities. The presentation takes as points of convergence of these debates several post-socialist cases such as the Museums of Occupation (Latvia and Estonia) – resonating a European understanding of memory – and discourses proposed by the few post-1989 truth (historical) commissions in Romania and the Baltics, all of which rhetorically revert to uses of politicized identities. Much of the official narratives proposed in these cases employ an ‘emphatic unsettlement’ that rejects both straightforward linear narratives of recovery and integral systems of truth and reconciliation. The analysis tracks how such instances of public memory engage with politicized identities. How do the double occupation paradigm and anti-communism then work with different intensities of nationalism? How do ‘memory imperatives’ (the Prague 2008 declaration is a case in point) intervene in these rhetorical uses of political subjectivities?
Related Presentations