Euroacademia Conferences
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition) April 24 - 25, 2020
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition) June 12 - 13, 2020
- 8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again January 24 - 25, 2020
- Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition) December 13 - 14, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition) October 25 - 26, 2019
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition) June 28 - 29, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition) January 25 - 26, 2019
- 7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again November 23 - 24, 2018
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition) September 28 - 30, 2018
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition) June 14 - 15, 2018
An Increasingly Awkward Partner? Images of the EU in the Brexit Debate
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Catherine MacMillan, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Download presentation
Abstract:
Euroscepticism has notably been on the rise across the European Union (EU), particularly in the context of the Eurozone crisis, as evidenced in particular by the dramatic success of Eurosceptic parties in the 2014 EP election. However, Euroscepticism in Britain, which has been described as the EU’s ‘awkward partner’, and as ‘semi-detached’ from the EU has deep roots. It has long tended to be sceptical towards supranational integration in particular, leading the country, for instance, to delay applying for EC membership until the 1960s, and, subsequently, to a series of opt-outs from a wide range of policies including the Schengen agreement, EU social policy and the adoption of the Euro. However, Britain’s ‘Euroawkwardness’ appears to have come to a head recently in the light of the upcoming referendum, due to take place on 23 June 2016, where the British people will be asked to vote on whether they want their country to remain in or leave the EU . Interestingly, there is no clear division between the ‘remain’ and ‘leave’ camps along party lines, with politicians from both the dominant Conservative and Labour parties found in both groups. On this basis, using Foreign Policy Discourse Analysis, a form of discourse analysis based on Foucault’s conception of discourse, the paper aims to place the current discourse on Brexit in the broader context of the dominant British discourse on state and nation and Europe. To this end, the paper analyses the discourse of both campaigns by focusing on speeches and articles of cross-party prominent politicians from both groups as well as both campaigns’ manifestos.