Brexit, History and Education: Recognising Conflict in a Period of Upheaval

• • 
  • Presentation speakers
    • Erin Bell, University of Lincoln, UK
    • Florian Gleisner, University of Lincoln, UK
  • Download presentation
    • Erin Bell - and - Florian Gleisner - Brexit History and Education - Recognising Conflict in a Period of Upheaval.pdf

  Abstract:

  This paper will outline the implications of the UK referendum of 23 June 2016 on a recently completed EU-funded project into History teaching in secondary schools. Various scholars have noted the problems that may arise for UK researchers, particularly but not solely after March 2019, in terms of access to funding and the loss of a shared research community (e.g. Stock 2018; Trees 2016); they have also have acknowledged the role of heritage and archaeology in bolstering the ‘new nationalisms’ arising in Europe as a whole in recent years, and in the UK in particular (e.g. Gardner 2017). However, little has been offered by scholars undertaking research with European partners during the period 2015-19. By contrasting the intended outcomes of the E-Story project with the actual results, the impact of the referendum, which took place within the first year of the 30-month project, was significant despite being primarily a UK event. Although many of the limitations faced by the UK team may be ascribed to the different pedagogical environment experienced by school teachers in the UK in contrast to, for example Italy, the months of campaigning forming a prelude to the referendum, and the aftermath of uncertainty and political division, undoubtedly shaped the responses of the educators, students and researchers involved. In addition, the focus of the project was the use of IT in teaching the history of the First World War, rather than European industrialisation or the history of the EU. This therefore positioned those engaging with UK teachers, who expected an overview of the aims of the project, as sharing the benefits of the EU whilst rehearsing a well-known history of conflict. This paper seeks, then, to interrogate the role of an international project about the representation of the past, during a period of historic social upheaval and uncertainty, by drawing on George Santayana’s assertion (1905) that ‘Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness…Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it’, and its misrepresentation in wider culture, in order to contextualise the contradictions posed by the project in a time of change and amnesia in the UK.

 

Related Presentations

 

Are “Brexiters” Indeed the Bad Guys? What Can We Learn from the Modern Game Theory and Economics of Federalism?

• Mitja Kovac

Optimism in a Contested Region – Forecasting the Future of the European Union and Armenia

• Justin Tomczyk

Left Problems, Nationalism and the Crisis

• Malcolm James
• Sivamohan Valluvan

Inequality, Macroeconomic Performance and Political Polarization: An Empirical Analysis

• Juan Carlos Peña
• Christian R. Proaño
• Thomas Saalfeld

Jürgen Habermas: The “Unfinished” European Project and the Claim of Solidarity

• Alessandro Volpe

Freedom as Non-Domination in the Eurozone: A Republican Assesment of the Eurozone Sudden-Stop Crisis

• Stefano Merlo