Euroacademia Conferences
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition) April 24 - 25, 2020
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition) June 12 - 13, 2020
- 8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again January 24 - 25, 2020
- Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition) December 13 - 14, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition) October 25 - 26, 2019
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition) June 28 - 29, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition) January 25 - 26, 2019
- 7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again November 23 - 24, 2018
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition) September 28 - 30, 2018
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition) June 14 - 15, 2018
Identity and Antagonism in the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Imogen Davidson White, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies, London
- Download presentation
Abstract:
In over 20 years of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, there has been no significant progress towards peace. It has been argued that there is now no incentive for leaders to agree to a compromise because citizens are unwilling to accept one. In this context, the way in which citizens conceive of themselves and the ‘enemy’ has real implications on the outcome of the conflict. This paper examines the assumptions and qualities attached to Azerbaijan and the future of Nagorno Karabakh in the newspaper Respublika Armenia during four crucial periods for the conflict in the last decade. Respublika Armenia represents a moderate, state-sanctioned discourse within Armenian media. The findings show an entrenching of distrust towards Azerbaijan and consistently rigid notions about the future of Nagorno-Karabakh in publicly accepted Armenian discourse. In fact, there is some indication that not only the discourse but the realities of the conflict are worse now than they were ten years ago. This leads into a wider discussion about anti-Azeri sentiment as a part of modern Armenian identity.
Related Presentations