Euroacademia Conferences
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition) April 24 - 25, 2020
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition) June 12 - 13, 2020
- 8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again January 24 - 25, 2020
- Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition) December 13 - 14, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition) October 25 - 26, 2019
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition) June 28 - 29, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition) January 25 - 26, 2019
- 7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again November 23 - 24, 2018
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition) September 28 - 30, 2018
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition) June 14 - 15, 2018
Regaining Dignity in Europe
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Zuzana Lučkay Mihalčinová, Human Dignity and Humiliation Studies, Slovakia
- Download presentation
Abstract:
The fact that Eastern Europe is an invention, a western imaginary does not need to be repeated. Hence what never existed cannot be reinvented, still the expression itself validates it into existence. The concept however is harmful only if the depiction intends to denote lesser quality or worth. This is counterproductive if Europe wants to pose as a whole, integrated package to the world, first we should have order at home and then present ourselves to the outside. Still, it seems that alterity making is a natural process, it happens nationally, the city versus the country, the north versus the south, the capital vs. non-capital cities carry various levels of imaginary worth. To my mind, the east-western Europe is a similar dichotomy. Yet, alterity making is not in itself a bad thing, it is part of identity creation and negotiation of worth. Looking at the raison d’être of the phenomenon and analysing it can be helpful though.
Obviously seeing social and political phenomena in dichotomies is not a fruitful approach. The distinction between the ‘West’ whatever that means, and the ‘East’ Europe was often explained by a ´twenty year gap´, in speed of development ‘where the measure is the level of democracy and capitalism’ and it was realistic in terms of economic and political development, but that was twenty years ago. As a result of communism there also was a detectable difference in the mentality of people a generation ago, but of course on a human level we cannot talk about a qualitative distinction. Overcoming the legacy of communism is one thing and it is just as difficult as overcoming Nazism, yet we don’t talk about post-Nazi Germany but we talk about post-communist East Europe. Can a country or region be defined by its past? If so then how long? If the gravity of the (political) system is the benchmark than the UK should be post-colonist, Germany post- Nazi. Obviously the problems with the rhetoric remain.
Can we talk about regaining dignity in eastern Europe? Is there indeed a collective dignity? In my opinion there are certain political systems in which it is impossible to maintain dignity. The question remains: If such a system is over does dignity reappear automatically?