Euroacademia Conferences
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition) April 24 - 25, 2020
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition) June 12 - 13, 2020
- 8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again January 24 - 25, 2020
- Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition) December 13 - 14, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition) October 25 - 26, 2019
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition) June 28 - 29, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition) January 25 - 26, 2019
- 7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again November 23 - 24, 2018
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition) September 28 - 30, 2018
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition) June 14 - 15, 2018
The Collective Identity of Philip the Bold’s Mourners and the Ideology of the Common Good
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Andrew Murray, Deutsches Forum für Kunstgeschichte, Paris
- Download presentation
Abstract:
Philip the Bold (1342-1404) was a French prince, duke of Burgundy and count of Flanders. His tomb, finished in 1411 and now in the Musée des beaux-arts de Dijon, is most famous for its set of 41 mourning sculptures. These figures have caused some confusion for scholars because, despite being highly individualised, no one has been able to determine their individual identities. This paper will argue that this is because their identity is a collective one. Drawing on Christine de Pizan’s descriptions of and eulogies to Philip as well as the political rhetoric within Philip’s own patent letters, this paper will argue that in the early Burgundian state to mourn the death of a duke was a means to represent and enact an idealised, loving relation between lord and subject. By being represented as mourned by a diversity of classes on his tomb, Philip was represented as a lord beloved by all for ruling for the ‘common good.’ This was a political ideology that was conditioned by the relatively even and delicate balance of power between the duke and the Flemish towns under his control in the wake of the 1379-85 Flemish rebellion. Philip was a ruler who depended on wider allegiance of a broad diversity of urban and noble elites than his forebears and successors. His rhetoric of the common good is an appropriation of the middle-brow ideology of his urban Flemish subjects and is used to make him appear to be a ruler who operates through dialogue and consent. It is also a set of ideals that finds form in Philip’s actual funeral and in the mourners of his tomb, who form a collective identity of diverse classes and personalities, without expressing the loyalties of any particular set of classes or factions.
Related Presentations