Euroacademia Conferences
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition) April 24 - 25, 2020
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition) June 12 - 13, 2020
- 8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again January 24 - 25, 2020
- Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition) December 13 - 14, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition) October 25 - 26, 2019
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition) June 28 - 29, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition) January 25 - 26, 2019
- 7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again November 23 - 24, 2018
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition) September 28 - 30, 2018
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition) June 14 - 15, 2018
The Historical Dimension of the “Battle for the Right to be Russian” between Ukrainian and Russian Intellectuals
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Sergei V. Sokolov, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
Abstract:
The matter of this paper concerns with the current state of Russian-Ukrainian relations. I will make an attempt to analyze the usage of historical arguments to shape actual visions of the opposite nations. More specifically, the paper deals with the questions what Russian nation is and which people belong to it. It is not very well known that some of the Ukrainian national-oriented intellectuals believe that the pristine Russians are Ukrainians indeed. They stated that the Muscovites were once mixed with the Tatars and therefore lost their national purity and can no longer be regarded as Russians. The opposite theory, widely spread among Russian intellectuals, holds that there is no such a nation like Ukrainians. The Russian intellectuals point out that the Muscovite Russians and their Kievan brothers are the same nation as they shared common history, religion and very close language. The paper traces back the two approaches from present to their roots in Russian and Ukrainian early modern historical writings, and demonstrates their connection with the problem of identification.
Related Presentations