Euroacademia Conferences
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition) April 24 - 25, 2020
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition) June 12 - 13, 2020
- 8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again January 24 - 25, 2020
- Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition) December 13 - 14, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition) October 25 - 26, 2019
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition) June 28 - 29, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition) January 25 - 26, 2019
- 7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again November 23 - 24, 2018
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition) September 28 - 30, 2018
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition) June 14 - 15, 2018
The Possibility of Philosophy of Nationality through Bertrando Spaventa’s Thought and its Alternative
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Sevgi Doğan, University of Pisa, Italy
- Download presentation
Abstract:
The discussion about the possibility of national philosophy is still actual philosophical problem. Because of his concern of the identity and originality of Italian philosophy, Bertrando Spaventa initiated this debate in a nation, which was being established. I will try to discuss the possibility of a national philosophy, which was asked by Bertrando Spaventa in the 19th century and in some sense, discussed by Antonio Gramsci in the 20th century as well. My question is not if Italian thought or philosophy—whatever you call it—, exists or not but the question is whether a national philosophy still exists in a national context; if there is a national philosophy what makes it to have a national character. Can we still talk about national philosophy and what makes a philosophy to be a national? The presentation tries to answer these questions. Besides, it tries to suggest a new concept in substitution for national philosophy. This proposed concept is the philosophical-culture, which contains the universal and particular in itself. Therefore, we can avoid the limitation of the conception of national philosophy. In this respect, another point worth mentioning is Gramsci’s evaluation of the separation between national-international or cosmopolitism-national State will shed light on the discussion about national philosophy by his theory of intellectual. In this point, Gramsci’s conception of culture helps us to understand the proposed concepts.
Related Presentations