Euroacademia Conferences
Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition)April 24 - 25, 2020
Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition)June 12 - 13, 2020
8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions AgainJanuary 24 - 25, 2020
Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition)December 13 - 14, 2019
The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition)October 25 - 26, 2019
Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition)June 28 - 29, 2019
The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition)January 25 - 26, 2019- 7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions AgainNovember 23 - 24, 2018
Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition)September 28 - 30, 2018- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition)June 14 - 15, 2018
Use of Scientific Evidence in EU Policy-Making: Better Accountability for EU Decision-Making?
-
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Edina Ocsko, Central European University
Abstract:
It was often argued in the past that lessons offered by policy evaluations rarely had a real impact on subsequent policy-decisions in the EU and elsewhere. However, important changes are taking place that influence the nature of EU decision-making.The Better Regulation agenda (launched in 2002) threw new light on policy-assessment research, and it is now the stated aim of the European Commission to better utilise programme evaluation and impact assessment results in policy-making. Data collection and the methods used for programme evaluation have also improved considerably over the past years, and increasing attention is now paid by academics and practitioners alike to what extent various methods can be utilized in programme evaluations. The paper aims to explore such changes in EU decision-making in the context of rural development policy. Rural development policy has traditionally been a policy-field dominated by political (farmers’ representations) interests in the EU. However, relevant rural stakeholders exert an increasing deliberative pressure on policy-making, and call for more accountability in decision-making.Data collection and quantitative methods are also used more extensively in rural development policy evaluations. This process may result in a combination of factors (other than political and interest group pressure) that impact on policy decisions, such as scientific/research findings and wide-scale stakeholder consultations. The paper particularly aims to explore these issues at national (Hungary) and European Commission levels with a view to the development of EU rural development policy for the programming period of 2014-2020. -
