Euroacademia Conferences
Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition) April 24 - 25, 2020
Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition) June 12 - 13, 2020
8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again January 24 - 25, 2020
Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition) December 13 - 14, 2019
The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition) October 25 - 26, 2019
Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition) June 28 - 29, 2019
The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition) January 25 - 26, 2019
7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again November 23 - 24, 2018
Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition) September 28 - 30, 2018
Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition) June 14 - 15, 2018
Assessing the Convergence After Enlargement
-
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Emanuel Crudu, IMT Insititute for Advanced Studies
Abstract:
According to the current state of the art, the enlargement proved to be the EU’s most successful instrument of foreign policy. Through incentives attached to the promise of accession, EU managed to exercise significant leverage in securing processes of democratization in Central and Eastern European candidate countries. The EU’s enlargement strategy has had also a ‘lock in’ effect against potential backsliding in the candidate countries thus fostering institutional change, effective political pluralism and alternation in power. The 2004 and 2007 waves of enlargement challenged EU’s ability to face simultaneous widening and deepening of integration. The argument in the current literature goes that through the enlargement strategy, the EU determined the convergence for the new members both in terms of substantive democratization as also in terms of attachment to western democratic values as community making factors. The present study aims to assess such claims in the current post-enlargement environment. While most of the convergence arguments were built within the literature before the effective enlargement took place, there was no post-enlargement follow up yet many assumptions regarding the expected convergence as political dynamic entered the common usage and are now taken for granted. This study, however, traces the rational choice and the sociological constructivist arguments – considered central for the shape such a topic has taken in recent debates – and identifies points where the prophesized convergence is to be questioned. The study argues further that the lack of a complete and substantive convergence will fuel further diversified integration and club based theories of integration. The current crises created an effective laboratory for assessing the convergence hypothesis. -
Related Presentations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36854/36854ca1570075707f646f7d1c617875f062ea86" alt="IMG_6985 IMG_6985"
Fragmentation and Fusion inside European Studies
- Nevena Dakovic
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b66/79b660decb6542668c62b121da0a9e6c281d93f9" alt="IMG_7083 IMG_7083"
The Future of the European Union Enlargement and Its Challenges
- Habibollah Abolhassan Shirazi
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f896b/f896b26252c3d1864fc8d4fe7e038dddd27b821f" alt="IMG_7002 IMG_7002"