Euroacademia Conferences
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition) April 24 - 25, 2020
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition) June 12 - 13, 2020
- 8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again January 24 - 25, 2020
- Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition) December 13 - 14, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition) October 25 - 26, 2019
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition) June 28 - 29, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition) January 25 - 26, 2019
- 7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again November 23 - 24, 2018
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition) September 28 - 30, 2018
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition) June 14 - 15, 2018
Unpuzzling Policies
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Takacs Gyula Peter, National Infocommunication Service Company Ltd., Budapest, Hungary
- Download presentation
“Puzzled by Policy?” (PbP) is a 3-year e-democracy pilot action project launched Sep-2010, funded by the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme. PbP has taken up the challenge to reconnect a disillusioned society to policy making by informing, consulting and empowering citizens at both national and European level, focusing on migration policies at four pilot sites: Athens, Turin, the Canary Islands, and Hungary. PbP builds on preexisting web technologies. Its web portal involves (1) Policy Profiler, a quiz positioning users between liberal and conservative attitudes to immigration, and among stances of stakeholder organizations. (2) U-debate, a structured forum lets users consult topics in their own language. Policy Profiler also runs as a (3) widget, a vehicle for viral marketing on social networking sites. Dissemination events, migration news and forum posts are also wall-posted. Pilot leads generate regular feedback to and from decision makers on the accumulated opinions. U-debate seems less popular than the quiz. While some cannot properly contribute to the debate tree, less structure makes summarizing the opinions for feedback more difficult. Citizens, NGOs and decision-makers all wait for others to attend before engaging the platform. A large immigrant population (as in Spain) can help attract a critical mass, but then a custom moderation regime is needed. Different topics of interests across countries also fragment the forum – automatic translation is little to pool users. Citizens increasingly depend on Facebook and waver at using different arenas, while portal operators need to keep adapting if they want to inter-operate. Differences in top-down and bottom-up approaches to policy making could possibly benefit from dedicated frameworks in U-debate.
PbP may reach its target number of users, but can it accomplish a sustainable solution from a set budget, in three years of a fast changing economic, social, political and technological environment?
Related Presentations