Euroacademia Conferences
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (9th Edition) April 24 - 25, 2020
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (9th Edition) June 12 - 13, 2020
- 8th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again January 24 - 25, 2020
- Re-Inventing Eastern Europe (7th Edition) December 13 - 14, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (8th Edition) October 25 - 26, 2019
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (8th Edition) June 28 - 29, 2019
- The European Union and the Politicization of Europe (7th Edition) January 25 - 26, 2019
- 7th Forum of Critical Studies: Asking Big Questions Again November 23 - 24, 2018
- Europe Inside-Out: Europe and Europeanness Exposed to Plural Observers (8th Edition) September 28 - 30, 2018
- Identities and Identifications: Politicized Uses of Collective Identities (7th Edition) June 14 - 15, 2018
A Symbolic Ethnography of Hope in the Era of Hyper-Consumption: Uncovering Love as a Nordic -Transylvanian Synthesis through Bureaucratic Sublimation
-
-
Presentation speakers
- Ioana Ionesco, Department of Global Political Studies, Malmö University, Sweden
- Tor Torsson, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden
- Download presentation
Abstract:
The proposed text is a “thick description”(Geertz, 1973) of the “symbolic order”(Lacan, 2006:12) mediating love letters, emails, and sms-es in the contemporary context of consumption-oriented and media-driven emotional blunting and hypersensitivity to clichés. The text is left on purpose in its raw format in order to allow for an unmediated understanding of the mechanisms inherent to it. The purpose is to show the paradoxical nature of the symbolic and its transformative potential to the imaginary, which in turn might constitute the very seed of hope for an alternative scenario of contemporary emotional experience. The alternative is uncovering itself through the language of “the system”, “the bureaucratic” or “the symbolic”, understood here inter-changeably, while at the same time working towards a continuous sublimation of its very medium and, by this, making space for itself to be discovered, manifested and preserved. The two subjects involved in the construction of an inter-subjective space seem entrenched in the symbolic order of Kafkaesque bureaucratic language when they refer to themselves as “The Bureau” in their subliminal attempts to approach and eventually uncover “the real”. However, it is by the very means of bureaucratic language that the subjects attempt to transgress its limitations and to mainstream their desires. In this sense, the struggle for uncovering the “real” could be understood as just another illustration of “the system destroying itself” (Žižek, 2011) and of deconstructing its repressive wholeness. The text could be regarded as an ethnography of self that could only be translated to the “other” in a wholesome manner through a (cross)disciplinary narrative. For this purpose, the text could be read through the lens of Lacan’sdistinction (2006) between “the real”, “the symbolic” and “the imaginary”with the hope that it “mirrors” furtive glimpses into “the real”.
Related Presentations